In Revathi’s case, her 100-day detention for Islamic rehabilitation at the Faith Rehabilitation Centre in Ulu Yam had been extended for another 80 days by the Malacca Syariah Court on the ground that “she did not co-operate during the 100-day detention”, prolonging her forced separation from her husband and 15-month baby daughter.
It is shocking that Malaysia has a new form of ISA-like powers of detention which could be extended indefinitely.
Nazri’s contention that Parliament is not the appropriate place to discuss these spate of issues impinging on religious rights and sensitivities cannot go unchallenged.
http://blog.limkitsiang.com/?p=157
在丽华蒂的个案上，她被扣留在乌鲁音的宗教改造中心，已进行为期100天的回教改造。他后来又被马六甲宗教局延长扣留80天，理由是她“在100天扣留期内没有合作”，迫使他与丈夫及15个月大的女儿分隔两地。
惊人的是，大马出现了像内安法令般的新扣留权力，可以无限期延长扣留期。
纳兹里辩称，国会不是讨论这一连串冲击宗教权益与敏感课题的适当平台。这种说法必须受到挑战。
http://cblog.limkitsiang.com/?p=344
No comments:
Post a Comment